Substate Federalism and Fracking Policies: Does State Regulatory Authority Trump Local Land Use Autonomy?
Identifieur interne : 004E87 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 004E86; suivant : 004E88Substate Federalism and Fracking Policies: Does State Regulatory Authority Trump Local Land Use Autonomy?
Auteurs : Charles Davis [États-Unis]Source :
- Environmental science & technology [ 0013-936X ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Gaz naturel, Prise de décision, Autonomie.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
State officials responsible for the regulation of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) operations used in the production of oil and gas resources will inevitably confront a key policy issue; that is, to what extent can statewide regulations be developed without reducing land use autonomy typically exercised by local officials? Most state regulators have historically recognized the economic importance of industry jobs and favor the adoption of uniform regulatory requirements even if these rules preempt local policymaking authority. Conversely, many local officials seek to preserve land use autonomy to provide a greater measure of protection for public health and environmental quality goals. This paper examines how public officials in three states- Colorado, Pennsylvania, and Texas-address the question of state control versus local autonomy through their efforts to shape fracking policy decisions. While local officials within Texas have succeeded in developing fracking ordinances with relatively little interference from state regulators, Colorado and Pennsylvania have adopted a tougher policy stance favoring the retention of preemptive oil and gas statutes. Key factors that account for between state differences in fracking policy decisions include the strength of home rule provisions, gubernatorial involvement, and the degree of local experience with industrial economic activities.
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000036
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: 004558
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Checkpoint: 000220
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 005143
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 004E87
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Substate Federalism and Fracking Policies: Does State Regulatory Authority Trump Local Land Use Autonomy?</title><author><name sortKey="Davis, Charles" sort="Davis, Charles" uniqKey="Davis C" first="Charles" last="Davis">Charles Davis</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Political Science, Colorado State University, B 351 Clark Building</s1><s2>Fort Collins, Colorado 80523</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>États-Unis</country><wicri:noRegion>Fort Collins, Colorado 80523</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">15-0040338</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 15-0040338 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:15-0040338</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000036</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">004558</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000220</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PascalFrancis" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000220</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0013-936X:2014:Davis C:substate:federalism:and</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">005143</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">004E87</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">004E87</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Substate Federalism and Fracking Policies: Does State Regulatory Authority Trump Local Land Use Autonomy?</title><author><name sortKey="Davis, Charles" sort="Davis, Charles" uniqKey="Davis C" first="Charles" last="Davis">Charles Davis</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Political Science, Colorado State University, B 351 Clark Building</s1><s2>Fort Collins, Colorado 80523</s2><s3>USA</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>États-Unis</country><wicri:noRegion>Fort Collins, Colorado 80523</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Environmental science & technology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Environ. sci. technol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0013-936X</idno><imprint><date when="2014">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Environmental science & technology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Environ. sci. technol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0013-936X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acquired experience</term><term>Autonomy</term><term>Colorado</term><term>Conflict</term><term>Decision making</term><term>Hydraulic fracturing</term><term>Land use</term><term>Local scope</term><term>Natural gas</term><term>Pennsylvania</term><term>Regional scope</term><term>Shale gas</term><term>Texas</term><term>United States</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Gaz naturel</term><term>Fracturation hydraulique</term><term>Prise de décision</term><term>Occupation sol</term><term>Autonomie</term><term>Echelon local</term><term>Echelon régional</term><term>Conflit</term><term>Etats-Unis</term><term>Expérience acquise</term><term>Colorado</term><term>Pennsylvanie</term><term>Texas</term><term>Gaz de schiste</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Gaz naturel</term><term>Prise de décision</term><term>Autonomie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">State officials responsible for the regulation of hydraulic fracturing (fracking) operations used in the production of oil and gas resources will inevitably confront a key policy issue; that is, to what extent can statewide regulations be developed without reducing land use autonomy typically exercised by local officials? Most state regulators have historically recognized the economic importance of industry jobs and favor the adoption of uniform regulatory requirements even if these rules preempt local policymaking authority. Conversely, many local officials seek to preserve land use autonomy to provide a greater measure of protection for public health and environmental quality goals. This paper examines how public officials in three states- Colorado, Pennsylvania, and Texas-address the question of state control versus local autonomy through their efforts to shape fracking policy decisions. While local officials within Texas have succeeded in developing fracking ordinances with relatively little interference from state regulators, Colorado and Pennsylvania have adopted a tougher policy stance favoring the retention of preemptive oil and gas statutes. Key factors that account for between state differences in fracking policy decisions include the strength of home rule provisions, gubernatorial involvement, and the degree of local experience with industrial economic activities.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>États-Unis</li></country></list><tree><country name="États-Unis"><noRegion><name sortKey="Davis, Charles" sort="Davis, Charles" uniqKey="Davis C" first="Charles" last="Davis">Charles Davis</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Amérique/explor/PittsburghV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 004E87 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 004E87 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Amérique
|area= PittsburghV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:15-0040338
|texte= Substate Federalism and Fracking Policies: Does State Regulatory Authority Trump Local Land Use Autonomy?
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.38. |  |